Auburn University Impact of Global Climate Change

The Question Rubrics

• It is absolutely okay to highlight published background remarks (including our textbook information) in your answers. It makes your research more compelling. But, you should also provide your critical thinking as an answer to this assignment. I will thoughtfully look for your critical thinking. Let me give you some thoughts; the excellent way to do this answer is to bridge the secondary readings and references to support your critical arguments and thinking rather than put them alone by themselves.
• Each short answer is required to have 100-125 words. If you write more than that, I wouldn’t mind reading, but that doesn’t change the point scale.
• Questions 4.2 and 4.4 are exceptional concerning word count.
• Insert the question in front of every answer (MUST)
• Employ both 1) pieces of knowledge of your thoughts and 2) background reading data with proper citation.
• Each answer worth 5 points (5X5=25)
• The main title page is required (MUST)
• Citations & References: You are required to provide at least one reference to each answer in MLA Style.
• Please don’t send me the complete website address. You got covert the website into MLA. Study the MLA format on the web.
• If you quote, it should be cited correctly in the main text and provide the reference under every answer, which gives me a clear understanding of your research

Answer Format:

• Answer four questions (4X25=100)
• Font: Times New Roman
• Font Size: 12
• Images are welcome
• Margin: 1 inch all sides
• The page number is required (MUST)
• Upload the ONLY word document because I need to provide comments and suggestions. If I receive a PDF, 10 points will be reduced.
• Late submission: will lose 10 points each day.
• If plagiarism is found more than 20 percent, in any answer(s), point reduction will take place. This is the instructor’s subjective decision.

 

Question-1: (5X5=25 points)

1.1 Global Climate Change and Biology Conservation

1.2 Chlorofluorocarbons and Climate Change

1.3 Arctic Sea Ice Disappearing and Ecosystem Change

1.4 Global Annual Mean Temperature Rises and Terrestrial Biodiversity Impact

1.5 Populations, Species, and Ecosystems Association and Climatic Conditions

Question-2: (5X5=25 points)

2.1 Conservation Challenges of Endangered Species

2.2 The Status Quo of Bengal Tiger and Conservation Measures

2.3 Primary forests are irreplaceable vs. sustaining tropical biodiversity

2.4 Illegal wildlife trade and Mitigation Measures

2.5 Biodiversity Hotspots

Question-3: (5X5=25 points)

3.1 Superfund Site and Terrestrial Life

3.2 Geographic Information Systems and Impact of Conservation of Biology

3.3 Ecological Restoration

3.4 Habitat Fragmentation and Amazon

3.5 Environmental Impacts and Deep-Water Oil and Gas Drill

Question-4: (5X5=25 points)

4.1 Extinctions and Prevention Methods

4.2 Using Figure 13.3, Provide 5 Countries Names for the 5 Different Map Legends

1. Under the 10% Target
2. 10% – 25%
3. 25% – 50%
4. 50% – 100%
5. Not considered forested (Under 0.1% forest cover

4.3 Miss-Managed Development Programs and Habitat Destruction

4.4 Using Figure 11.1, Write 5 Common Statements of Global Geographic Regions concerning Biodiversity Conservation

4.5 Identify 5 Constructive Current Biodiversity Conservation Challenges and 5 Future Directions / Strategies.

 

Order Number			45471455714
Type of Paper			Essay
Writer Classification Level			Undergraduate
Style of Writing			MLA/APA/CHICAGO/
Sources and References			5
Number of Pages			4
	Distinguished (100%)	Proficient (85%)		Basic (70%)	Below Expectations (50%)	Non-Performance (0%)
Thesis Statement	Raises the strongest   objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is strongly grounded in research and logical reasoning.	Raises a plausible objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is mostly grounded in research and logical reasoning.		Raises an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is somewhat grounded in research and logical reasoning.	Attempts to raise an objection to the thesis presented in the assignment. The objection is minimally grounded in research and logical reasoning.	The objection to the thesis is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Counter Argument	Provides a strong, thorough rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal effectively demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and applies the principles of charity and accuracy.	Provides a rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal mostly demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and mostly applies the principles of charity and accuracy.		Provides a limited rebuttal to the objection. The rebuttal somewhat demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and somewhat applies the principles of charity and accuracy.	Attempts to provide a rebuttal to the objection; however, the rebuttal minimally demonstrates that the thesis can withstand the objection and does not apply the principles of charity and accuracy.	The rebuttal is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.
Conclusion	Provides clear and concise closing remarks that comprehensively summarize the essay. The remarks consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem.	Provides closing remarks that summarize the essay. The remarks mostly consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are somewhat unclear.		Provides closing remarks that minimally summarizes the essay. The remarks minimally consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problems. The closing remarks are unclear and/or vague.	Attempts to provide closing remarks that summarize the essay; however, the remarks do not consider the broader controversy and/or further research that could offer additional insight into the moral solution of the business problem. The closing remarks are unclear and vague.	The closing remarks are either nonexistent or lack the components described in the assignment instructions.
Written Communication: Context of and Purpose for Writing	Demonstrates methodical application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is evident and easy to understand. Summaries, quotes, and/or paraphrases fit naturally into the sentences and paragraphs. Paper flows smoothly.	Demonstrates sufficient application of organization and presentation of content. The purpose of the writing is, for the most part, clear and easy to understand. There are some problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper flows somewhat smoothly.		Demonstrates a limited understanding of organization and presentation of content in written work. The purpose of the writing is somewhat evident but may not be integrated throughout the assignment. There are many problems with the blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly in all sections.	Organization and presentation of content are extremely limited. The purpose of the writing is unclear. There is little or no blending of summaries, paraphrases, and quotes. Paper does not flow smoothly when read.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Control of Syntax and Mechanics	– Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.	Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand		Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.	Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Required Formatting	Accurately uses required formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.	Exhibits required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors.		Exhibits limited knowledge of required formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all requirements.	Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of required formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as required style.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Word Requirement	The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of words.	The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of words.		The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of words.	The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of words.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.
Written Communication: Resource Requirement	Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.	Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.		Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.	Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.	The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.